The revenue from licensing fees, renewals, and the sports wagering tax would have been deposited into the fund. The proposed law would have established the California Online Sports Betting Trust Fund. The amendment would have taken effect on January 1, 2023. The initiative would have given the division authority to regulate the online sports betting industry and investigate illegal sports betting activities. The proposed law would have created the Division of Online Sports Betting Control within the Department of Justice. The amendment would have prohibited online sports betting on youth sports. Proposition 27 proposed a constitutional amendment and statute to authorize a gaming tribe, an online sports betting platform with an operating agreement with a gaming tribe, or a qualified gaming company with a market access agreement with a gaming tribe may operate online sports betting for individuals 21 years of age or older in the state but outside of Indian lands. Overview What would Proposition 27 have done? See also: Measure design
10.3.1 The Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA) and Murphy v.
10.3 2018 Supreme Court ruling on sports betting.2.3 Where else was sports betting legal?.2.2 Who supported and opposed Proposition 27?.2.1 What would Proposition 27 have done?.
